EMERGING SUBJECTIVITY AND MEANING WITHIN THE LABOR PROCESS OF INDIAN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

Authors

  • Chandra Shekhar Joshi National Institute of Fashion Technology, New Delhi, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2020.61.324330

Keywords:

Meaningful, Information Technology, Subjectivity, Identity, Work

Abstract

The limitless possibility of ‘being’, whatever one wants ‘to become’ in the contemporary ‘liquid modern times’ inherently accentuates complexities and ambiguities (Bauman 2000) in the ‘conceptualization of self’. Rather than offering  conduit for fulfillment and stable anchoring for personal identity (Alvesson and Willmott 2002), work in the new economy and corresponding altered employment relations, seem to impose corporate narratives of ‘how one ought to be’. Resulting identities warrant for continuous identity work and thus aggravate perpetual feelings of insecurity and anxiety (Collinson 2003). In absence of traditional anchors of meaning (Sennett 1998) and corresponding unrealized quest  for alternative forms of attachment and belonging (Jackall 1998), subjectivities at work are precarious at the very least. Given the context, the paper interrogates worker subjectivity within the labor process of Indian Information Technology (IT) to delineate meaningful work experiences for employees. The findings explicated from ethnographic field work indicate that despite significant contribution to the Indian economy and catapulting sizeable number of families into higher social strata, the software economy has also resulted in what has been described as ‘deteriorating culture’ by most of the respondents. Unsurprisingly, transactional employment relationships, eroding mutual trust and individual predisposition to self-securing orientation have been found to be prominent characteristics of Indian IT workplaces. It seems that contradictions inherent in the individualization oriented IT labour process in a quasi-collectivistic society such as India erodes the capacity of work in providing salient identity dimensions to its employees. Interestingly, the findings from the field also indicate that work itself has no meaning but it is the instrumentality of work in achieving other life projects, particularly those associated with positive valence in the society which makes work experience as meaningful or meaningless.

References

Alvesson M., & Willmott, H. (2002). Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual. Journal of Management Studies, 39(5): 619-–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00305

Bailey C., Lips-Wiersma, Madden A., Yeoman R., Marc Thompson M., & Chalofskye N. (2019. The five paradoxes of meaningful work: Introduction to the special Issue ‘Meaningful Work: Prospects for the 21st Century’. Journal of Management Studies. 56(3). Jhon Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12422

Baumann, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity (Cambridge: Polity UK)

Chakraborty C. & Dutta D. (2002) Indian Software Industry: Growth Patterns, Constraints and Government Initiatives: ASARC Working Papers

Collinson, D. L. (2003). Identities and Insecurities: Selves at Work. Organization, 10(3), 527–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084030103010

Edwards T. (2011) Reassessing the Employment Relationship. Springer.

Foucault, M. (2012). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Vintage.

Jackall, R. (1988). Moral: The world of corporate managers. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01390690

Michaelson, C. (2019). A normative meaning of meaningful work. Journal of Business Ethics. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04389-0

Rosso D., Dekas H & Wrzesniewski A. (2010) On the Meaning of Work: A Theoretical Integration and Review. Research in Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2010.09.001

Rae G. (2010). Alienation, authenticity and the self. History of the Human Sciences. 23(4), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695110375763

Sennett, R. (1998). The Corrosion of character the personal consequence of work in the new capitalism. New York, NY: W.W.Norton

Sinha, J. B. (1984). A model of effective leadership styles in India. International Studies of Management & Organization, 14(2-3), 86-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.1984.11656388

Upadhya C. (2016). Reengineering India: work Capital, Class in offshore economy. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199461486.001.0001

Upadhya C., VAsavi A.R. (2016). In an Outpost of the Global Economy: Work and Workers in India’s Information Technology Industry. Routledge.

Watson, T. J. (1994). Management “flavours of the month”: their role in managers' lives. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 5(4), 893-909. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585199400000071

Yeoman R. (2013). Conceptualizing Meaningful Work as a Fundamental Human need. Journal of Business Ethics. 235-251 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1894-9

Yeoman R., Bailey C., Madden A. & Thompason M. (2019). The oxford handbook of meaningful work. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198788232.001.0001

Downloads

Published

2020-04-11

How to Cite

Joshi, C. S. (2020). EMERGING SUBJECTIVITY AND MEANING WITHIN THE LABOR PROCESS OF INDIAN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 6(01), 324–330. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2020.61.324330