STIMULATING THE CREATION OF NEW PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGIES AS A FACTOR OF TECHNOLOGICAL MODERNIZATION

Authors

  • Zhanna Mingaleva Professor, Department of Economics and Management in Industrial Production, Director of the Research Center for Sustainable Development and innovation processes, Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Perm, Russian Federation Professor, Department of State and Municipal Government, Perm State National Research University, Perm, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2018.42.858874

Keywords:

Technological Modernization, New Technologies, Econometric Model, Factor Analysis, Sustainable Development, Import of Technology, Innovation Development

Abstract

The task of intensifying efforts to stimulate the process of creating advanced production technologies today is facing the modern economy. To this end, it is necessary to identify those factors that directly influence the creation of new national high technologies for production, regardless of regional specifics and regional policy and irrespective of technology imports. This was set as the research goal in this article.The method of least squares was used to construct an econometric model. A semi-logarithmic model was obtained after all recalculations that best corresponded to the stated research task and the selected criteria for selecting variables.As a result of the research, two factors were identified that are not related to each other, but have a direct impact on the creation of new national high production technologies - a patent issued for inventions and internal R&D expenditures. A purposeful impact on these factors will allow ensuring the technological modernization of the country's production base, the development of the scientific and technical potential of key sectors and sectors of the economy, and the growth of the country's intellectual resources.In the future, it is necessary to continue the factor analysis of the process of creating new technologies with the aim of activating and strengthening it. It is necessary to focus on stimulating the process of creating technologies that meet world standards and outrun them.

References

Alcácer, J., & Zhao, M. (2012). Local R&D strategies and multilocation firms: The role of internal linkages. Management Science, 58 (4), 734-753. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1451

Al-Mubaraki, H., & Aruna, M. (2013). Technology Innovation for SME Growth: A Perception for the Emerging Economies. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 4(3), 156-162.

Angelino, H., & Collier, N. (2004). Comparison of innovation policy and transfer of technology from public institutions in Japan, France, Germany and the United Kingdom. NII Journal, 8, 53-90.

Baykal, B. (2015). A new approach to strategic planning in entrepreneurial process: effectuation. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 1 (2), 1-18.

Bommer, M., & Jalajas, D.S. (2004). Innovation sources of large and small technology-based firms. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 51(1), 13-18. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2003.822462

Chakroun, N. (2017). Using technology transfer offices to foster technological development: A proposal based on a combination of articles 66.2 and 67 of the TRIPS agreement. Journal of World Intellectual Property. 20(3-4), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12077

Christensen, C. M. (1992a). Exploring the limits of the technology S-curve. Part I: component technologies. Production and Operations Management, 1 (4), 334-357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.1992.tb00001.x

Christensen, C. M. (1992b). Exploring the limits of the technology S-curve. Part II: component technologies. Production and Operations Management, 1 (4), 358-366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.1992.tb00002.x

Christensen, C. M. (1997). The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

Christensen, C. M. (2002). The opportunity and threat of disruptive technologies. MRS Bulletin, 27 (4), 278-282. https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs2002.81

Christensen, C. M., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (1995). Explaining the attacker's advantage: Technological paradigms, organizational dynamics, and the value network. Research Policy, 24 (2), 233-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(93)00764-K

Danilina, E.I., Mingaleva, Z.A., Malikova, Y.I. (2016). Strategic personnel management within innovational development of companies. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, Volume VII, Issue 5 (19), JARLE-ASERS, 1004–1013.

Danilina H., Mingaleva Zh. (2013). Improving of Innovation Potential Efficiency of Industrial Enterprises. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, 13: 191-194.

David, P. A. (1975). Technical choice, innovation and economic growth. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA.

Di Benedetto, C. A., DeSarbo, W. S., & Song, M. (2008). Strategic capabilities and radical innovation: An empirical study in three countries. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55 (3), 420-433. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2008.922645

Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11(3), 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6

Dosi, G. (1984). Technical Change and Industrial Transformation. London, Mаcmillan. – 338 р. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17521-5

Dosi, G., & Grazzi, M. (2005). Technology as problem-solving procedures and technology as input-output relations: Some perspectives on the theory of production. LEM Working Paper Series, No. 2005/26.

Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., Kilic, K., & Alpkan, L. (2011). Effects of innovation types on firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(2), 662-676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.014

Hemmert, M. (2004). The influence of institutional factors on the technology acquisition performance of high-tech firms: survey results from Germany and Japan. Research Policy, 33, 1019-1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.04.003

Indicators of Innovation in the Russian Federation: 2018: Data Book / N. Gorodnikova, L. Gokhberg, K. Ditkovskiy et al.; National Research University Higher School of Economics. – Moscow: HSE, 2018.

Ivarsson, I., & Alvstam, C. G. (2017). New technology development by Swedish MNEs in emerging markets: The role of co-location of R&D and production. Asian Business and Management, 16 (1-2), 92-116. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-016-0013-z

Japang, M., Rosie C., Nasah J., Supinah R. & Yoag A. (2016). Preliminary profile of ICT-based SMEs in adopting knowledge management. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 2(3), 01-18. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2016.23.0118

Jones, G. K., Lanctot, A. Jr., & Teegen, H. J. (2001). Determinants and performance impacts of external technology acquisition. Journal of Business Venturing, 16 (3), 255-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00048-8

Kamin, J. Y., Bijaoui, I., & Horesh, R. (1982). Some determinants of cost distributions in the process of technological innovation. Research Policy, 11 (2), 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(82)90036-1

Kasavina, N. A. (2015). The development of science in the context of the new industrialization. Bulletin of the Omsk University. Series: The Economy, 3, 259-264.

Kim, H., & Kwon, Y. S. (2011). Determinants of External Technology Acquisition: Comparison across Sectors of Manufacturing Industry in Korea. IMECS 2011 - International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 2011, 2, 1281-1284.

Komkov, N. I. (2014). Complex forecasting of scientific and technological development: experience and lessons. Problems of forecasting, 2 (143), 3-17.

Lowe, J., & Taylor, P. (1998). R&D and technology purchase through licence agreements: complementary strategies and complementary assets. R&D Management, 28 (4), 263-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00103

Matejun M (2017). The effect of innovative potential on small business performance PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3 (1), 80–100.

Mingaleva Zh., Danilina H. (2014). Significance of technological innovations for an increase of competitiveness of industrial companies. Life Science Journal Volume: 11 (SPEC. ISSUE 8): 211-215.

Mingaleva, Zh., & Mirskikh, I. (2009). The Problems of Legal Regulation of Intellectual Property Rights in innovation activities in Russia (Institutional approach). World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 29, 464-476.

Montalvo, J. G., & Yafeh, Y. (1994). A microeconometric analysis of technology transfer. The case of licensing agreements of Japanese firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 12 (2), 227-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7187(94)90015-9

Moon, C. W. (1998). Technological capacity as a determinant of governance form in international strategic combinations. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 9 (1), 35-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/1047-8310(88)90004-1

Narin, F., & Frame, J. D. (1989). The growth of Japanese science and technology. Science, 245 (4918), 600-605. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.245.4918.600

Naumov, I. V. (2014). Problems of innovative and technological development of the region. Journal of Economic Theory, 1, 99-108.

Nieto, M.J., & Santamaría, L. (2010). Technological collaboration: Bridging the innovation gap between small and large firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 48(1), 44-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2009.00286.x

Pavitt, K. (1981). Technology in British industry: a suitable case for improvement. Industrial policy and innovation, 88-115.

Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13 (6), 343-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0

Poon, J., & MacPherson, A. (2005). Innovation strategies of Asian firms in the United States. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management - JET-M, 22 (4), 255-273. URL: https://www.scopus.com/search/submit/citedby.uri?eid=2-s2.0-79960608899&refeid=2-s2.0-27944501533&src=s&origin=reflist&refstat=core (Date of access: 12.01.2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2005.09.001

Rosenberg, N. (1976). Perspectives on Technology. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511561313

Rosenbloom, R .S., & Christensen, C. M. (1994). Technological discontinuties, organizational capabilities, and strategic commitments. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3 (3), 655-685. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/3.3.655

Rosstat. Science and innovations (2017). Official site: http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect /rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/science_and_innovations/science (verification date 18.01.2018)

Rosstat. Regions of Russia (2017) Official site: www.gks.ru (verification date 18.01.2018)

Sahut, J.M., & Peris-Ortiz, M. (2014). Small business, innovation, and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 42(4), 663-668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9521-9

Saviotti, P. (1996). Technological Evolution, Variety and the Economy. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham UK, 1996.

Science and Technology Indicators: 2018: Data Book / N. Gorodnikova, L. Gokhberg, K. Ditkovskiy et al.; National Research University Higher School of Economics. – Moscow: HSE, 2018.

Science, technology, innovation: a brief statistical compilation 2017. National Research University Higher School of Economics. – Moscow: HSE, 2017.

Shulgina, I. V. (2013). Russian science in technologies and innovations (based on the analysis of science statistics). Sociology of Science and Technology. 2013, 4 (2), 54-63.

Sun, Z. (2014). Domestic technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 12 (2), 149-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/14765284.2014.900944

Tidd, J., Bessant J., & Pavitt, K. (1998). Managing innovation: integrating technological, market and organizational change. Wiley Chichester.

Tyler B., & Steensma, H. (1995). Evaluating technological collaborative opportunities: A cognitive modeling perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 43-70. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160917

Vodolazhskaya E. L., & Avilova V. V. (2017). Model of the technological order in the theory of innovative cyclic development. Advances in modern science, 7 (4), 137-139.

Downloads

Published

2018-08-28

How to Cite

Mingaleva, Z. (2018). STIMULATING THE CREATION OF NEW PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGIES AS A FACTOR OF TECHNOLOGICAL MODERNIZATION. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), 858–874. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2018.42.858874